Weighing Romance
Cód:
491_9781801117265
De: R$ 0,00Por: R$ 152,47ou X de
Its hard to find true love. People romanticize everything in the hope that it looks like movies and books, but its challenging to keep love, and this requires two. Love is essential to some, and some love each other more than chains that love to be attached to someone. People should be in pairs, but not everyone has the patience and power to keep love.Romanticism flourished in American culture in the 19th century. Men and women were encouraged to express their intimate thoughts in letters. The high literacy rate and reliable postal service facilitated romantic communication. Enthusiasts can quote their favorite poets based on a large amount of romantic literature. More casual lovers of less intimate acquaintances could buy valentines from the mid-19th century. Mount Holyoke Esther Holland manufactured the first commercial valentines sold in the United States. He hired local women to create creations with ribbons, sparkles, and paper cords on a conveyor belt.In the 19th century, married women from the middle and upper classes were idealized as mothers and women. Their appearance, their social activities, their prosperity, and their family ties are essential factors for potential partners. Men exceeded the couples choice. For women, wife and mother were a feat to strive.Although romance still plays a significant role in choosing partners for women of the 21st century, interest in selecting a partner has declined. In 2006, the Pew Trust found that only 16% of unclosed Americans are actively looking for a partner. And if you are looking for love, marriage is not necessarily an unrealistic goal.Love is not everything.Love is not the same as compatibility. Everyone has different knowledge, experience, maturity, and skills.Love must get better. Do not forget who you are in love with. You have your career, dream, goals, and life mission. Love is just a part of your life, not an end goal.Love does not do business. Love must not come back.Love does not necessarily solve pr
Veja mais
